As upland hunters, we are not any strangers to the general public lands managed by the Bureau of Land Administration (BLM). The chance to hunt a large swath of untamed native and even non-native birds on these landscapes represents among the largest entry alternatives within the nation. We share BLM land with a lot of America’s different pursuits, together with power, livestock grazing, and timber harvesting. For essentially the most half, when carried out accurately, these actions have minimal affect on the multiple-use panorama. I’m certain many people have skilled taking pictures birds with oil rigs close by.
The BLM was created to handle publicly held land for “a number of use and sustained yield.” Within the Federal Land Coverage and Administration Act (FLPMA) of 1976, we outlined these lands as serving a number of functions—together with recreation, grazing, timber, power improvement, and conservation.
In 2024, the Public Lands Rule went into impact. The rule justified the elevation of conservation values on the multiple-use panorama. Nonetheless, this previous April, the White Home rescinded it as a technique to bolster power improvement on BLM lands regardless of a scarcity of battle between the business and conservation. Not solely that, however the administration moved ahead with the rescission with out first opening up a public remark interval, doubtlessly violating the Administrative Process Act (APA).
The Public Lands Rule
In June 2024, the Public Lands Rule reaffirmed the intent of FLPMA by placing conservation and recreation on equal footing with power, mining, grazing, timber harvesting, and different makes use of. To be clear, this implies placing searching alternatives and habitat for sport animals in a greater place on productive public lands. Basically, a nonprofit or different group might lease land and handle it for conservation functions—efforts that, in flip, profit us as hunters. The aim was to assist offset long-term harm to BLM lands by restoring habitats to make them extra resilient—a win for each the general public and wildlife.
In April 2025, the White Home Workplace of Administration and Funds posted a rescission discover for the Public Lands Rule. This motion signaled the administration’s intent to roll it again with out going by means of the normal public discover and remark interval sometimes required for such regulatory modifications.
Let’s be clear: in 2024, we hit a document excessive for extracting crude oil on public lands in the US, averaging 13.4 million barrels per day—the very best in U.S. historical past. The Public Lands Rule and power dominance coexisted with little difficulty.
So, to place it plainly—why would we dispose of the Public Lands Rule? And why, as a conservation-minded neighborhood, are we not offended about it?
Defining the Public Lands Rule
In keeping with the BLM web site, “The rule acknowledges conservation as a vital part of public lands administration, on equal footing with different a number of makes use of of those lands. Individuals depend on public lands to ship meals, power, clear air and water, wildlife habitat, and locations to recreate. The BLM is aware of the significance of balancing the usage of our pure assets with defending public lands and waters for future generations.”
The rule outlines three key parts:
Defend clear water and wildlife habitat
Restore lands and waters that want it
Make knowledgeable administration choices based mostly on science, knowledge, and Indigenous information.
Maybe some of the necessary—and infrequently neglected—points of the Public Lands Rule is its express name for knowledgeable decision-making based mostly on science and knowledge. As hunters, science-based administration is a cornerstone of profitable conservation.
Hunters Assist The Public Lands Rule
The Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership (TRCP) said, “Among the many modifications made to the conservation rule, the BLM offered elevated readability to slim the potential applicability of restoration leasing and mitigation leasing on BLM land. The company additionally clarified that habitat connectivity is a element of intact landscapes. TRCP believes that these, and different refinements, handle critiques fabricated from the draft rule, and the group encourages the BLM to focus closely on collaboration through the implementation course of.”
Hunters aligned themselves with the rule rapidly, serving to make the rule profit habitat-based missions. Among the many first organizations to interact with the BLM on this new rule have been Pheasants Endlessly, the Mule Deer Basis, and the Rocky Mountain Elk Basis.
As of April 2025—marking one yr because the rule took impact—the BLM has not launched any knowledge on how the rule has affected leasing or offered any extra data on its implementation.
Why Does Anybody Wish to Do Away with the BLM Public Lands Rule?
The first teams which have come ahead in opposition to this rule embody the American Exploration & Mining Affiliation, the Western Vitality Alliance, the Nationwide Cattlemen’s Beef Affiliation, and the states of Utah and Wyoming. These states have filed lawsuits in opposition to the BLM, claiming that the rule violates federal statutes by prioritizing conservation over conventional land makes use of.
The principle causes for opposition are a perceived deprioritization of conventional BLM land makes use of and issues concerning the financial affect on rural communities. A 2023 BLM report famous that public land use supported 949,000 jobs and contributed $252.1 billion in whole financial output—together with from leisure actions.
One authorized argument in opposition to utilizing FLPMA to justify the Public Lands Rule is that such a rule requires congressional approval. Paradoxically, that is additionally the basic reasoning behind the present administration’s try to rescind the rule—regardless of the administration steadily bypassing congressional oversight on public lands by means of govt coverage.
What The BLM Public Lands Rule Can Do For Conservation
By putting conservation on equal footing with different land makes use of, the Public Lands Rule created the potential for restoration and mitigation efforts on BLM land to offset harm from actions like grazing, mining, and power improvement. That is particularly crucial for degraded and at-risk habitats, resembling sagebrush and grasslands. The rule would have allowed teams to determine key areas in want and actively restore these habitats, serving to mitigate long-term environmental harm.
The rule additionally would have enabled us to maneuver crucial lands into conservation leases to assist wildlife corridors, forestall habitat fragmentation for sport species, and strengthen protections for Areas of Crucial Environmental Concern (ACECs). ACECs are one of many final strains of protection for at-risk species. One instance is the 58,000-acre Lesser Prairie-Rooster Habitat Preservation ACEC. One other is the 22,000-acre Gunnison Sage-Grouse ACEC. Whereas ACECs aren’t created underneath the Public Lands Rule, they may have gained added safety and precedence underneath it, whereas additionally setting a framework for figuring out and safeguarding different important habitats.
This strategy additionally supplied a strong outlet for searching nonprofits. Non-governmental organizations might put their members’ cash to work in ways in which not solely aligned with their conservation missions, however offered stronger long-term assurances for crucial habitat initiatives—in the end benefiting hunters for generations to return.
We can not emphasize sufficient how necessary science-based land administration is to making sure our future. The Public Lands Rule might have helped stability our power wants with rising the long-term resilience of the land.
The implications of the Public Lands Rule translated to higher-quality entry for hunters on lands managed for a number of makes use of—maximizing wildlife potential whereas additionally contributing to native economies.
What Can We Do About The Public Lands Rule?
The administration’s rescission of the Public Lands Rule has bypassed public remark—a transfer many argue is a violation of the Administrative Process Act. This isn’t the primary time a Trump administration has bypassed the APA, and in each earlier case, the courts discovered the administration in violation of it. As of April 2025, nevertheless, no lawsuits have been filed difficult the elimination of the Public Lands Rule on APA grounds.
This implies our solely viable choice is to achieve out to our congressional representatives and push again in opposition to this doubtlessly unlawful motion that deprioritizes conservation on BLM lands. We should additionally assist unfold the phrase about how the Public Lands Rule benefited hunters—with out, as the info exhibits, disrupting the priorities of power dominance. In any case, the BLM itself emphasised that the rule balanced “the usage of our pure assets with defending public lands and waters for future generations.”
Learn Extra
The Productive Public Lands Act Would Open Vitality Growth On Threatened Gunnison Sage-Grouse Habitat
How Do Nationwide Monuments Have an effect on Looking Entry?
S1E1 Nice Basin Sage Grouse – Venture Upland Podcast
Midwestern Bobwhite Quail Conservation: The Time for Motion is Now
