Just a few weeks in the past, I revealed an article highlighting the ten greatest trendy looking cartridges. My intention wasn’t to hate on older cartridges, simply to offer a listing of a number of the greatest new choices of the final 25 years.
Nonetheless, some commenters felt compelled to defend their favourite cartridges (an honorable impulse), and several other argued that these newfangled PRC’s and Creedmoor’s and ARC’s are all hat and no cattle. They don’t truly outperform tried-and-true designs—they’re simply meant to fleece the looking public for extra money and provides gun writers one thing to spill ink on.
I don’t agree with this solely, but it surely received me questioning whether or not these Fudds (who I really like) might need some extent. It’s onerous to argue that trendy cartridges don’t have something to supply, however are these advantages price, say, the price of a brand new rifle? Are they far and away higher than the old-timers or simply marginally simpler?
To reply this query, I pulled ballistic knowledge for every of the ten cartridges I named within the earlier article and matched them up towards older however comparable cartridges. I attempted to select matchups that used related calibers and weights of bullets (although some comparisons are extra pure than others). I additionally tried to pick consultant examples of every cartridge. Any cartridge may be sped up or slowed down on the reloading bench, and even manufacturing facility choices provide a spread of velocities. However I attempted to select a best-case-scenario for each cartridges and never stack the deck in somehow.
The info speaks for itself, however I’ll say this on the outset: the Fudds might need some extent.
Dan Hogan, the daddy of MeatEater’s Greg Hogan, poses with a Willamett Valley blacktail buck and his dad’s rifle (1968).
6mm ARC (103g ELD-X) vs. 243 Win. (90g ELD-X)
This matchup typifies the “outdated vs. new” paradigm. The 243 Win. gives extra velocity and a flatter trajectory out to 600 yards, however the 6mm ARC overtakes it from an power perspective by 400 yards. The ARC’s high-BC bullet can also be much less impacted by wind at each distance, and it almost closes the speed hole by 600 yards. Whichever facet of this debate you land on, the information on this matchup gives proof to again you up.
Scroll/swipe to see further charts.
Velocity
Power
Trajectory
Wind Drift
Vary
6mm ARC
243 Win.
6mm ARC
243 Win.
6mm ARC
243 Win.
6mm ARC
243 Win.
0
2800
3150
1793
1983
-2
-2
0
0
100
2620
2906
1569
1687
0
0
1
1
200
2446
2676
1369
1431
-4
-3
3
3
300
2280
2457
1188
1207
-13
-10
6
7
400
2120
2249
1028
1011
-29
-23
11
12
500
1966
2052
884
841
-53
-43
18
20
600
1820
1865
758
695
-86
-72
27
30
6.5 Creedmoor (143g ELD-X) vs. 260 Rem. (140g OTM)
The 6.5 Creedmoor is most frequently in comparison with the .308 Win., however those that actually need to take the Creedmoor bros down a notch convey up the 260 Remington. The Remington has the identical bullet diameter because the Creedmoor, and on this matchup, the trajectories are almost indistinguishable out to 600 yards. By 500 yards, the Creedmoor has a slight edge in velocity, power, and wind drift, and that benefit grows for those who transfer previous 600 yards or for those who use the 147-grain match bullets for the Creedmoor. However at commonest looking distances, you gained’t discover any distinction between the Creedmoor and the Remington.
Scroll/swipe to see further charts.
Velocity
Power
Trajectory
Wind Drift
Vary
6.5 Creedmoor
260 Rem.
6.5 Creedmoor
260 Rem.
6.5 Creedmoor
260 Rem.
6.5 Creedmoor
260 Rem.
0
2700
2735
2314
2325
-2
-2
0
0
100
2554
2579
2070
2068
0
0
1
1
200
2412
2429
1847
1834
-4
-4
2
2
300
2275
2284
1644
1621
-14
-13
5
5
400
2143
2143
1458
1428
-30
-30
10
10
500
2015
2008
1289
1253
-54
-53
15
16
600
1892
1878
1136
1096
-87
-86
23
24
6.5 PRC (143g ELD-X) vs. 270 Win. (145g ELD-X)
This comparability is rather less pure than the primary two because the PRC is meant to imitate a magnum cartridge and it makes use of a barely narrower bullet than the .270 Win. However as you may see, the bullet weights and muzzle velocities are almost similar, and the .270 Win. deserves an opportunity to greatest certainly one of its newer counterparts. The trajectories are almost similar out to 600 yards, however the PRC opens up a 100 fps and a 130 ft.-lbs. hole regardless that the bullets start at virtually the identical velocity. As with most trendy cartridges, it additionally strikes much less with a ten mph crosswind, on this case about 4 inches (20 vs. 24 inches).
Scroll/swipe to see further charts.
Velocity
Power
Trajectory
Wind Drift
Vary
6.5 PRC
270 Win.
6.5 PRC
270 Win.
6.5 PRC
270 Win.
6.5 PRC
270 Win.
0
2960
2970
2782
2840
-2
-2
0
0
100
2805
2791
2499
2507
0
0
0
1
200
2657
2618
2240
2207
-3
-3
2
2
300
2512
2453
2004
1937
-11
-11
5
5
400
2373
2293
1788
1693
-24
-25
8
10
500
2238
2140
1590
1474
-44
-45
13
16
600
2107
1992
1410
1278
-70
-73
20
24
28 Nosler (160g Accubond) vs. 7mm Weatherby Magnum (160g Nosler Partition)
When the 28 Nosler was launched in 2015, the advertising and marketing supplies made it sound like nothing prefer it had ever been completed earlier than. However ol’ Roy Weatherby would disagree. He put out the 7mm Weatherby Magnum all the way in which again in 1947, and its ballistic properties are just like the a lot newer cartridge. However “related” isn’t “similar.” The 28 Nosler (additionally a 7mm bullet) enjoys a 100 fps and 200 ft.-lbs. edge on the muzzle over the older cartridge, and people gaps stay constant via 600 yards. That permits the Nosler to keep up a flatter trajectory and hit 9 inches larger at that vary, and it strikes about 4 inches much less. You’ll have higher luck discovering high-BC bullets with the newer Nosler, however for those who already personal a 7mm Weatherby Magnum, I wouldn’t really feel an enormous must exit and get a 28 Nosler.
Scroll/swipe to see further charts.
Velocity
Power
Trajectory
Wind Drift
Vary
28 Nosler
7mm Wby. Magazine.
28 Nosler
7mm Wby. Magazine.
28 Nosler
7mm Wby. Magazine.
28 Nosler
7mm Wby. Magazine.
0
3300
3200
3868
3637
-2
-2
0
0
100
3104
2987
3423
3169
0
0
0
1
200
2917
2784
3023
2753
-2
-2
2
2
300
2739
2590
2664
2384
-8
-9
5
6
400
2567
2405
2340
2055
-19
-21
9
10
500
2402
2228
2049
1763
-35
-39
14
17
600
2243
2058
1786
1504
-57
-65
21
25
7mm PRC (175g ELD-X) vs. 7mm Rem. Magazine. (175g Fusion Tipped)
I selected a heavier, 175-grain bullet for the 7mm Rem. Magazine. on this comparability, and it struggles to stick with with the 7mm PRC. The PRC beats it in each class at each distance out to 600 yards, and a number of the gaps are important. The 7mm Rem. Magazine. does a little bit higher utilizing the 163-grain bullet, however if you wish to use that heavier, 175-grain capsule, the PRC is a transparent winner. You’ll be able to most likely discover a 175-grain bullet that performs a little bit higher within the Rem. Magazine., but it surely’ll be robust to compete towards the PRC’s velocity benefit, all else being equal. Of the ten trendy vs. conventional comparisons, I feel that is the clearest trendy winner.
Scroll/swipe to see further charts.
Velocity
Power
Trajectory
Wind Drift
Vary
7mm PRC
7mm Rem. Magazine.
7mm PRC
7mm Rem. Magazine.
7mm PRC
7mm Rem. Magazine.
7mm PRC
7mm Rem. Magazine.
0
3000
2775
3497
2992
-2
-2
0
0
100
2859
2615
3175
2656
0
0
0
1
200
2722
2460
2879
2352
-3
-4
2
2
300
2590
2311
2605
2076
-10
-13
4
5
400
2461
2167
2353
1825
-23
-29
7
10
500
2336
2029
2121
1599
-41
-52
12
16
600
2215
1895
1906
1396
-66
-84
17
24
He wasn’t utilizing a rifle, however this photograph of the grandfather of MeatEater’s Hunter Spencer is just too good to not share. He’d lately returned from World Warfare II’s European theater, and determined to get a photograph after a terrific day within the squirrel woods.
300 WSM (180g Accubond) vs. 300 Win. Magazine. (178g ELD-X)
The 300 Winchester Brief Magnum guarantees 300 Win. Magazine. energy in a short-action bundle. As you may see within the comparability beneath, it delivers on that promise out to 600 yards. The Win. Magazine. holds a slight benefit in each class, however I wouldn’t say it’s sufficient to make an entire lot of distinction. Many hunters will fortunately commerce rather less velocity and power for a lighter rifle with extra capability, which is what the WSM was designed to supply.
Scroll/swipe to see further charts.
Velocity
Power
Trajectory
Wind Drift
Vary
300 WSM
300 Win. Magazine.
300 WSM
300 Win. Magazine.
300 WSM
300 Win. Magazine.
300 WSM
300 Win. Magazine.
0
2950
2960
3478
3462
-2
-2
0
0
100
2761
2782
3047
3059
0
0
1
1
200
2581
2612
2662
2695
-3
-3
2
2
300
2407
2448
2316
2367
-11
-11
6
5
400
2241
2289
2007
2071
-26
-25
11
10
500
2081
2137
1730
1805
-47
-45
17
16
600
1928
1991
1485
1566
-76
-74
26
24
300 PRC (212g ELD-X) vs. 300 Win. Magazine. (200g ELD-X)
The 300 PRC was billed as a contemporary model of the 300 Win. Magazine. It’s a quick, magnum cartridge that does certainly surpass the 300 Win. Magazine. in velocity, power, trajectory, and wind drift. Its 212-grain bullet is shifting precisely the identical velocity because the 300 Win. Magazine.’s 200-grain bullet, which provides it an power benefit out of the gate. Nevertheless it will increase that preliminary benefit downrange, and by 600 yards, it’s hitting with virtually 300 further foot-pounds of power. It additionally strikes about three inches much less in a ten mph crosswind at 600 yards, and has a barely flatter trajectory, as well. Win. Magazine. followers will say that these slight benefits don’t truly matter a lot within the subject, since most pictures within the subject are taken effectively inside 600 yards; PRC followers will argue that they do, and that the PRC’s actual advantages don’t kick in till previous 600 yards. Either side have some extent, and thus the talk continues.
Scroll/swipe to see further charts.
Velocity
Power
Trajectory
Wind Drift
Vary
300 PRC
300 Win. Magazine.
300 PRC
300 Win. Magazine.
300 PRC
300 Win. Magazine.
300 PRC
300 Win. Magazine.
0
2860
2860
3850
3632
-2
-2
0
0
100
2720
2703
3483
3243
0
0
0
1
200
2585
2551
3144
2889
-3
-3
2
2
300
2453
2404
2833
2567
-12
-12
4
5
400
2326
2262
2546
2273
-26
-26
8
9
500
2202
2125
2282
2006
-46
-48
13
15
600
2082
1993
2041
1764
-74
-77
19
22
338 Federal (200g Fusion SP) vs. 308 Win. (178g ELD-X)
The 338 Federal is one other cartridge that was launched particularly to enhance upon an current possibility. The Federal makes use of a .308 Win. case however necks it as much as settle for a .338-caliber bullet. It guarantees extra power heading in the right direction with out the related recoil of a magnum and whereas sustaining the .308’s compact dimensions. As you may see from the charts beneath, it does certainly make good on that promise. It pushes a 200-grain bullet 2,700 fps, which is 100 fps quicker (someway) than a .308 can launch a 178-grain bullet. In a task reversal from the outdated vs. new matchups we’ve seen thus far, the .308 truly overtakes the 338 in velocity and power between 300 and 500 yards. Trajectories stay similar to about that distance, however the .308 drifts considerably much less within the wind. As you may see, the .338 is a contemporary cartridge that bucks the trendy cartridge pattern. It gives extra energy and velocity and shorter distance, which, if we’re being trustworthy, is the place most hunters are taking pictures, anyway. That’s nice for moose and elk hunters who would possibly desire a little bit of an edge with nothing greater than a barrel swap.
Scroll/swipe to see further charts.
Velocity
Power
Trajectory
Wind Drift
Vary
338 Federal
308 Win.
338 Federal
308 Win.
338 Federal
308 Win.
338 Federal
308 Win.
0
2700
2600
3237
2671
-2
-2
0
0
100
2484
2440
2739
2352
0
0
1
1
200
2278
2285
2304
2064
-4
-4
3
3
300
2082
2137
1925
1804
-15
-15
8
6
400
1896
1993
1597
1570
-34
-34
15
12
500
1722
1856
1317
1362
-62
-61
25
19
600
1560
1726
1081
1177
-103
-99
38
28
350 Legend (165g FTX) vs. 44 Rem. Magazine. (225g FTX)
I had essentially the most hassle discovering a superb comp for the 350 Legend. I assumed concerning the 45-70 Authorities, but it surely hits with a lot extra energy on the distances you’d truly shoot these cartridges. I feel a greater straight-wall comparability is the 44 Rem. Magazine. The 350 Legend flies quicker, however the 44’s heavier bullet means power heading in the right direction is comparable at each distance out to 600 yards. However the 350’s velocity provides it a flatter trajectory, and at 300 yards you solely have to return up 30 inches as in comparison with the 44’s 53 inches. Whether or not your rifle can shoot precisely out to 300 yards is a distinct story, however the bullet may have drifted about 10 fewer inches in a 10mph crosswind, in order that’ll assist, too.
Scroll/swipe to see further charts.
Velocity
Power
Trajectory
Wind Drift
Vary
350 Legend
44 Rem. Magazine.
350 Legend
44 Rem. Magazine.
350 Legend
44 Rem. Magazine.
350 Legend
44 Rem. Magazine.
0
2200
1755
1773
1812
-2
-2
0
0
100
1886
1456
1303
1248
0
0
2
3
200
1604
1219
943
875
-8
-15
8
13
300
1362
1060
680
661
-30
-53
20
29
400
1173
961
504
543
-71
-123
38
52
500
1045
889
400
465
-137
-229
62
79
600
961
828
338
403
-235
-380
91
110
375 Ruger (300g DGX) vs. 375 H&H (300g DGX)
This one is fairly easy. The 375 Ruger’s barely bigger case capability provides it a velocity benefit over the H&H that it carries with it all through its 600-yard journey downrange. It hits with extra power, shoots a little bit flatter, and is rather less impacted by the wind. You’ll be able to take these benefits to the financial institution, or you may money them in for a rifle with a shorter barrel however equal efficiency to the tried-and-true H&H. The H&H’s resume is over a century outdated, so we all know what it will possibly and may’t do. With the 375 Ruger, you may mimic that efficiency–and profit from the related peace of thoughts–whereas utilizing a 22-inch barrel somewhat than 24-inch barrel. Once more, not an enormous distinction, however for those who’re operating a suppressor, the 375 Ruger rifle will likely be a little bit extra handy getting out and in of the safari Jeep.
Scroll/swipe to see further charts.
Velocity
Power
Trajectory
Wind Drift
Vary
375 Ruger
375 H&H
375 Ruger
375 H&H
375 Ruger
375 H&H
375 Ruger
375 H&H
0
2660
2530
4712
4263
-2
-2
0
0
100
2340
2219
3647
3280
0
0
1
1
200
2043
1931
2780
2484
-5
-6
6
6
300
1770
1669
2086
1855
-18
-21
14
15
400
1525
1437
1549
1376
-43
-48
26
28
500
1316
1246
1154
1034
-82
-93
43
47
600
1154
1103
886
811
-142
-159
66
71
Picture by way of MeatEater’s Matt Miller.
Final Shot
Trendy cartridge aficionados would possibly take subject with the truth that I restricted the vary to 600 yards. If you happen to lengthen a shot out to 700 or 1,000 yards, the marginal benefits you may see within the charts widen considerably. However it is a record of looking cartridges, not competitors ones, and 95% of hunters won’t ever (or ought to by no means) take a shot previous 400 yards, not to mention 600.
Nevertheless, it’s additionally true that velocity, power, trajectory, and wind drift aren’t the one components to contemplate. These charts don’t embrace recoil and accuracy, two key elements to creating an efficient shot. Whereas older cartridges aren’t essentially much less correct, you’ll have higher luck in that division with a manufacturing facility rifle chambered in a contemporary cartridge. The tolerances are a little bit tighter, so I’ve discovered they often shoot higher teams out of the field.
Backside line? This debate will proceed for the foreseeable future as a result of each side have some extent. Trendy cartridges aren’t the perfect factor since sliced bread. That 6.5 Creedmoor/260 Rem. comparability reveals that somewhat than reinventing the wheel, the Creedmoor simply rolled a wheel down a hill whereas individuals have been wanting to maneuver some furnishings. If you happen to suppose your hunt’s success will come right down to 4 fewer inches of wind drift at 500 yards, it is best to most likely rethink your technique.
Nonetheless, many trendy cartridges do provide actual benefits. They use powder extra effectively, hit with much less recoil, and do a greater job in windy circumstances. These benefits may be marginal at frequent looking distances, however for those who may give your self a slight edge within the subject, why not take it?
Characteristic picture by way of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service/Wikimedia commons.